News Round Up 6/9/ – 6/15/2025 part 3 – old

Details of the Event

Filed in Albany federal court, the lawsuit targets New York’s 2020 law prohibiting ICE arrests in or near courthouses without judicial warrants. The administration argues it violates the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause and hinders ICE’s mission. ICE claims courthouses are ideal for arrests due to their controlled settings.

Key Developments

The lawsuit escalates Trump’s war against sanctuary policies, targeting New York’s Democratic leadership.

No ruling has been issued, but the case may reach the Supreme Court.

ICE insists judicial warrants are unnecessary for civil immigration arrests.

Background Information

New York’s law protects undocumented immigrants from ICE during court appearances and uphold access to justice. Trump’s first term saw a surge in courthouse arrests, prompting state pushback. The lawsuit reflects a broader push to dismantle sanctuary policies.

Implications

For Immigrants: Reinstating courthouse arrests could deter court attendance and harm due process.

For Policymakers: A ruling against New York could weaken state authority.

For Communities: Tensions in Democratic cities could spike, fueling protests.

Quotes and Perspectives

ICE Official: “These laws pose intolerable obstacles to federal immigration enforcement.”

Senator Brad Hoylman-Sigal on CNN, June 13: “This is about ensuring immigrants can access courts without fear. Trump’s tactics are pure intimidation.”

Laura Coates, CNN: “This case could redefine federal-state dynamics. New York’s safety argument is strong, but the Supremacy Clause looms large.”